The year in cardiology 2016: imaging

Download PDF


Victoria Delgado1, Oliver Gaemperli2, Massimo Lombardi3, Philipp A. Kaufmann4, Jeroen J. Bax1*


1 Heart Lung Centrum, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
2 Cardiac Imaging, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese Milan, Italy
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland


PREAMBLE

Cardiovascular diseases remain the main cause of death in Europe.1 Current mortality statistics show that more than 4 million people die from cardiovas-cular diseases every year. Non-invasive cardiovascu-lar imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. In 2016, many articles focused on prognostic impact of current non-invasive imaging techniques and tech-nological innovations were published. A selection of these articles on the use of non-invasive cardiovas-cular imaging, including echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), nuclear imaging, and fusion imaging is presented here.

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Echocardiography is the imaging technique of first choice to evaluate patients with cardio-kardivascu-lar diseases. A recent analysis of the largest, publicly available, all-payer inpatient database of the United States has shown that during 2001 and 2011 approxi-mately 7 669 000 echocardiograms were performed and a steady increase in the volume of echocardio-grams was noted with an average annual grew rate of 3.41%.2 Although these numbers would suggest an overuse of this diagnostic procedure, the results from the 2010 nationwide inpatient sample showed other-wise. When analysing fi ve clinical scenarios accounting for 3.7 million hospital admissions (cerebrovascular di-sease, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and sepsis), echocardiography was performed only in 8% of the cases indicating a significant underuse of echocardiography. Importantly, the use of echocardiography was associated with sig-nificantly lower odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality in these fi ve clinical scenarios. Additional studies will be warranted to provide more information on the association between access to echocardiography and clinical outcomes.
Lung ultrasound is another application of echocar-diography and is considered a first-line test to assess pulmonary congestion in patients with suspected acu-te heart failure.3 The detection of B-lines (reflection of discrete air/fl uid interfaces between collapsed, fl u-id-filled, and well-aerated alveoli) on the anterolate-ral chest scan indicates a progressive increase of ex-travascular lung water. The number of Blines can be summed to generate a semiquantitative score of the extravascular lung water content.4 The incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of the use of lung ultrasound was investigated in 195 heart failure patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV symptoms evaluated at the outpatient clinic.5 Of the 185 patients with adequate lung ultrasound data, 59 (32%) had ≥3 B-lines while only 17 (9%) had crackles on auscultation. Patients with higher number of B-li-nes showed more severe heart failure symptoms and higher levels of NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide. In addition, patients with ≥3 B-lines had a four-fold hi-gher risk of the primary endpoint (hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or all-cause mortality) at 6 months follow-up compared with patients without B-lines (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95–8.54; P < 0.001). The use of lung ul-trasound provided incremental prognostic value over auscultation as shown by an incremental discrimina-tion improvement of 6.4% for the primary endpoint. These results are promising and indicate that the use of lung ultrasound may help in the risk stratification of heart failure patients. Standardization of the tech-nique, adequate training to obtain and interpret the data and demonstration that lung ultrasoundguided therapy results in better outcome will help to imple-ment this imaging technique in clinical practice.6
Although left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is an important criterion in the decision making of pati-ents with cardiovascular disease, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography has shown to be more sensitive than LVEF to detect subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and has incremental value to predict out-comes.7 In a population-based cohort of 791 white Europeans (52% women, 50.8 ± 15.5 years old), Kuz-netsova and colleagues demonstrated the incremental prognostic value of LV GLS to predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events (i.e. coronary events, stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation, heart failure, life-threate-ning arrhythmias, and aortic events).8 During a median follow-up of 7.9 years (5729 person-years of follow-up), 96 individuals presented at least with one cardi-ovascular event (16.8 events per 1000 person-years). On multivariate analysis, each 1 SD decrease in LV GLS was associated with 75% increase in the risk of cardio-vascular events. Furthermore, the addition of LV GLS to a model containing several demographic and clinical covariates resulted in a moderate improvement in the ability of the model to discriminate between patients with and without events (net reclassification impro-vement 0.31; P = 0.003). The incremental prognostic value of LV GLS over LVEF was additionally demonstrated in a study including 1065 heart failure patients with reduced LVEF.9 The primary endpoint (all-cause mortality) was reached by 177 (16.7%) patients after a median follow-up of 40 months. Patients who died showed worse LVEF (23.8 ± 9.9% vs. 28.2 ± 9.1%; P < 0.001) and GLS (-8.1 ± 3.0% vs. -9.9 ± 3.2%, P < 0.001) compared with patients who were alive. When patients were divided according to GLS tertiles, pati-ents within the highest GLS tertile group (most im-paired GLS) had three times higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with patients of the lowest tertile (best GLS) (HR 3.38, 95% CI 2.3–5.1; P < 0.001). After adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic variables, LV GLS was the only echocardiographic parameter in-dependently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.15 per each 1% increase – less negative – in GLS; P = 0.008) and its addition to the model resulted in 9.27% increment in the net reclassification improvement. These fi ndings suggest that, even in patients with poor LVEF, LV GLS shows even more deteriorated LV per-formance and improves risk stratification. Assessment of LV systolic function may be more complicated in patients with reduced LVEF and significant secondary mitral regurgitation. By unloading the LV into the left atrium, LVEF may overestimate the true LV systo-lic function. The hypothesis that LV GLS may better reflect the true LV systolic function in patients with significant mitral regurgitation was tested in a study including 150 non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients, 50% of them with significant secondary mitral regurgi-tation.10 Despite having comparable LVEF as per inclu-sion criteria, patients with signifi cant mitral regurgita-tion had significantly more impaired LV GLS compared with patients without (-8.08 ± 3.33 vs. -9.78 ± 3.78%, respectively; P = 0.004) (Figure 1).
Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardio-graphy (TEE) data of the mitral valve analysed with proprietary software has shown important differences in mitral valve deformation (strain) along the systolic phase in patients with organic mitral regurgitation and normal controls:11 the posterior mitral leaflet showed higher strain intensity than the anterior mitral leaflet and the distribution of high strain was consistently ob-served in the commissures, boundary zones near the mitral annulus and coaptation line while the central leafl et zone had the lowest strain. Although patients with organic mitral regurgitation had higher strain in-tensities in the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets compared with controls, the distribution of high strain was similar. The clinical implications of these findings need further investigations. Finally, it has been sugges-ted that the aortic valve calcification burden may be associated with sex and aortic valve haemodynamics. In a large cohort of 888 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement, Thaden et al. showed that male sex, current smoking, bicuspid morphology, and larger LV outflow tract area were independently associated with high weight of the excised aortic valve whereas diabetes and hypertensi-on were associated with lower weight of aortic valve.12 Despite similar aortic valve area, male had higher aor-tic valve weight and calcification burden than women suggesting that the aortic valve stenosis severity does not explain sex-related differences in excised aortic valve weight and calcification burden.

Figure 1. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain vs. left ventricular ejection fraction to assess left ventricular systolic function in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. Example of two patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Despite comparable left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the patient with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) has more impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) as compared with the patient without MR. Reproduced with permission of Oxford University Press from Kamperidis et al.10  This figure has been reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

The year 2016 has witnessed a number of important publications in the fi eld of cardiovascular CT. In 5185 participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atheroscle-rosis (MESA), Yeboah et al. explored the incremental prognostic value of non-traditional risk markers (co-ronary artery calcium score [CACS], anklebrachial index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and family history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [AS-CVD] over traditional risk estimation by the pooled cohort equation (the current standard of risk estima-tion recommended by the American College of Cardiology [ACC]/American Heart Association [AHA] guidelines).13 Of all risk markers, CACS was the only parameter to improve the predictive accuracy of the pooled cohort equation as measured by a significant albeit modest increase in the Harrel’s c-statistic (0.76 vs. 0.74, P = 0.04) and a total net reclassification im-provement of 0.119 (95% CI, 0.080–0.256). Current ACC/AHA cholesterol management guidelines have broadened indications for statins in primary preven-tion raising concerns of overtreatment and increased costs.14 In another MESA publication, Nasir and collea-gues explored the value of a zero CACS to reclassify patients currently eligible for statins into a low-risk category where statin therapy may no longer be re-quired.15 Of 2966 participants eligible for statins (i.e. statin either recommended or considered), 1316 (44%) had a CACS = 0 at baseline and an observed 10-year ASCVD event rate of 4.2 per 1000 person-years. Thus, more widespread use of CACS may help to ‘de-risk’ a sizable number of subjects where statin therapy for primary prevention could be avoided.
In a substudy of the Prospective Multicenter Ima-ging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial, quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of an anatomical (coronary CT angiography [CTA]) vs. functional di-agnostic testing strategy were assessed in 5985 sta-ble coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.16 At 24 months, there were no strategy-related differences in the Duke Activity Status Index and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency scale, or any of the secon-dary QoL measures. The randomized Computed To-mography vs. Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (CRESCENT) trial had a similar design than PROMISE albeit with a considerably smaller study population (n = 350).17 Moreover, patients in the ana-tomical arm followed a tiered CT protocol including a ‘gate-keeper’ CACS scan followed by coronary CTA only if CACS was between 1 and 400. After 1.2 years, event-free survival was 96.7% for patients randomized to CT and 89.8% for patients randomized to functional testing (P = 0.011). After CT, the final diagnosis was established sooner, and additional downstream testing was required less frequently, resulting in lower cumu-lative diagnostic costs (€369 vs. €440; P < 0.0001). Taken together, PROMISE and CRESCENT further document non-inferiority of an initial CT-based ana-tomical imaging strategy compared with traditional functional testing strategies (i.e. stress ECG, stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy) in stable CAD patients.
The Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography (BEACON) study randomized 500 low-risk patients with acute chest pain presenting to the emergency department of seven Dutch hospitals to immediate coronary CTA vs. standard care including serial testing with high-sen-sitivity troponin assays (hsTrop).18 The coronary CTA group had lower direct medical costs (€337 vs. €511, P < 0.01) and less outpatient testing after the index emergency department visit (4% vs. 10%, P < 0.01). However, (in contrast to previously published Ame-rican trials with standard troponin assays) there were no differences in the number of revascularizations, the emergency department discharge rates, or the length of stay. Hence, in the era of hsTrop (allowing more accurate and faster rule-out of myocardial infarction), the BEACON study questions the utility of early co-ronary CTA in suspected acute coronary syndrome patients.
CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) conti-nues to raise interest in 2016: in a substudy of the Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angio-graphy: Next Steps (NXT)-trial, Gaur and colleagues evaluated the association between coronary steno-sis severity, plaque characteristics and FFRCT in 484 vessels from 254 patients.19 The presence of low-den-sity non-calcifi ed plaque (≥30 mm3) and FFRCT (≤0.80) increased significantly the diagnostic accuracy of coronary stenoses to detect lesion-specific ischemia (as assessed by invasive FFR), documented by an increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.71 to 0.90 (P < 0.001). The non-rando-mized Prospective LongitudinAl Trial of FFRCT: Outco-me and Resource IMpacts (PLATFORM) trial assessed the impact of FFRCT on clinical outcomes, downstream resource utilization and costs in two parallel observa-tional arms, one with an intended invasive strategy (n = 380) and one with planned non-invasive testing (n = 204).20 In the planned invasive stratum, FFRCT lowered mean costs by 33% ($8,127 vs. $12,145; P < 0.0001) on 1 year follow-up; however, in the planned non-in-vasive stratum, mean costs were slightly higher when using an FFRCT cost weight equal to coronary CTA.
Beyond coronary arteries, this year’s CT publicati-ons have highlighted the clinical potential of the tech-nique to assess valvular disease. Early hypo-attenuated leafl et thickening (HALT) of trans-catheter aortic val-ve implants (TAVI) has emerged as a new entity with uncertain prognostic and therapeutic implications. Pa-che and colleagues followed 156 TAVI patients with early routine coronary CTA (a median of 5 days post-TAVI with a balloon-expandable prosthesis) and found HALT in 16 (10.3%) patients (Figure 2).21 The occur-rence of HALT was not associated with antiplatelet regimen or any of the baseline or procedural charac-teristics. HALT did not produce any symptoms but was associated with restrictive cusp motion and sli-ghtly higher transaortic mean pressure gradient (14.9 ± 5.3 vs. 11.6 ± 3.4 mmHg, P = 0.026). Full anticoagula-tion restored normal cusp morphology and motion in almost all patients. Gündüz and colleagues investigated the utility of CT to distinguish pannus from thrombus after surgical aortic valve replacement.22 In 37 patients with mechanical prosthetic aortic valve dysfunction and evidence of periprosthetic mass, CT demons-trated significantly lower attenuation of thrombotic masses (defined as masses which completely resolved upon thrombolysis or were surgically identifi ed as a clot) compared with pannus (87 ± 59 vs. 322 ± 122 Hounsfi eld units [HU]; P < 0.001). A cut-off at 145 HU provided high sensitivity (87.5%) and specifi city (95.5%) in discriminating pannus from thrombus. Fi-nally, CT has also demonstrated clinical value for the assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after surgical mitral valve replacement. Suh and co-workers com-pared the diagnostic accuracy of CT, transthoracic echocardiography, and TEE in 204 patients with pre-vious surgical mitral valve replacement, of which 78 underwent redo surgery.23 CT had very comparable accuracy to TEE, but appeared to have superior sensi-tivity and negative predictive value than transthoracic echocardiography (although the difference did not re-ach statistical significance). TEE, however, was better in predicting the exact location of paravalvular leakage than CT (86% vs. 76%).

Figure 2. Axial and sagittal oblique reconstructions of a CORONARY CTA scan in an 80-year-old female immediately after implantation of a balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis (A and B), at 3 months- (C and D), and at 6 months-follow-up (E and F). Note subtle early hypo-attenuated thickening (HALT) of the non-coronary cusp (A and B) which progressed to 5 mm thickening of the non-coronary cusp and included the right coronary cusp (C and D). After a combination of clopidogrel and phenprocoumon follow-up coronary CTA showed almost complete resolution of HALT. (E and F). Reproduced with permission of Oxford University Press from Pache et al.21  This figure has been reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE

The evidence showing the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR techniques in individuals with increased cardiovascular risk, patients with valvular heart disea-se or patients with cardiomyopathies is accumulating. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of aortopathy in patients with bicuspid aortic valve have been the focus of extensive CMR research. To de-monstrate how transvalvular rheological disturbances infl uence the expression and severity of aortopathy associated with aortic stenosis, Girdauskas et al.24 evaluated with conventional CMR 190 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant sur-gery of the proximal ascending aorta: 137 patients had a bicuspid aortic valve while the remaining 53 had a tricuspid aortic valve. Aortopathy was defined by an end-diastolic cross-sectional diameter ≥22 mm/m2 or ≥40 mm at any level of the proximal aorta. The proportion of patients with aortopathy was higher among patients with bicuspid aortic valve as compared to pa-tients with tricuspid valve (35% vs. 11%, P = 0.008). In terms of CMRderived rheological parameters, pa-tients with bicuspid aortic valve had greater angle between the LV outflow tract and the aortic root and more frequently asymmetric aortic valve orifice com-pared with their counterparts. On logistic regression analysis, only the angle between the LV outfl ow tract and the aortic root, and the angle between the systolic flow jet and the aortic wall were independently associ-ated with aortopathy whereas valve morphology was not associated, suggesting that, in patients with aortic stenosis, these rheological variables may be more re-lated to aortopathy than aortic valve morphology per se. Four-dimensional flow CMR has provided further insight into the relation between blood fl ow patterns in the ascending aorta and valve morphology.25,26 Using this technique, Garcia et al.25 showed in 50 patients with bicuspid and 50 patients with tricuspid aortic val-ve and dilated aorta that patients with bicuspid aortic valve have higher peak fl ow jet velocity between the LV outflow tract and the sinotubular junction compared with patients with tricuspid valve, despite having com-parable aortic dimensions. On multivariate analysis, age and peak flow jet velocity were the only signifi cant correlates of maximal aortic dimensions. Furthermo-re, in 37 patients with various grades of aortic steno-sis and 37 healthy volunteers, helical and vertical flow formations and flow eccentricity were assessed in the ascending aorta using four-dimesional flow CMR.26 Compared with healthy volunteers, patients with aor-tic stenosis showed more frequently marked helical and vertical flow formation and eccentric flow with asymmetrical and elevated distribution of peak systo-lic wall stress in the ascending aorta. Smaller aortic orifice areas were associated with more vertical flow formation and eccentric flow and higher flow displa-cement whereas bicuspid aortic valve morphology was significantly associated with intense helical fl ow forma-tion and higher fl ow displacement and peak systolic wall shear stress.
Tissue characterization with late gadolinium enhan-cement (LGE) and T1 mapping CMR techniques have shown to be more sensitive than electrocardiographic parameters or biomarkers to detect myocardial scar and fibrosis. Of 1840 participants in the MESA study who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease at ba-seline (in 2000–2002) and underwent LGE CMR in the 10th year examination (2010–2012), 146 (7.9%) individuals showed myocardial scar.27 In 78% of them, myo-cardial scar was unrecognized by electrocardiogram or clinical evaluation. Age, male sex, body mass index, hypertension, and CACS (adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity) at baseline were associated with presence of myocardial scar at year 10. The odds ratio for myocar-dial scar of a CACS value ≥400 was three-fold higher compared with CACS of 0. The prognostic implicati-ons of these findings were not evaluated. The associ-ation between presence of midwall myocardial scar/ fibrosis and adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis was investigated by Chin et al.28 From 147 pa-tients with mild-to-severe aortic stenosis and no pri-or myocardial infarction who underwent LGE CMR, a score including clinical, biomarker, echocardiogra-phic, and electrocardiographic variables independently associated with the presence of midwall myocardial scar/fibrosis was derived. Low risk of myocardial fi-brosis was defined by a risk score of <7% whereas high risk was defined by a risk score of >57%. The prognostic value of this score was validated in two cohorts of asymptomatic patients with at least mild aortic stenosis: 127 patients from an internal cohort and 289 patients from an external cohort, resulting in 1560 patient-years. In the internal cohort, a high risk score was associated with seven-fold higher mortality rates compared with patients with low risk score (13 vs. 2.1 all-cause death/100 patient-years; P < 0.001). Similarly, in the external cohort, high-risk patients had 31.6 aortic stenosis related events (cardiovascu-lar death, heart failure and new symptoms)/100 pati-ent-years compared with 4.6 aortic stenosis related events/100 patient-years in the low-risk patients (P < 0.001).
Assessment of reactive diffuse myocardial fi brosis with T1 mapping techniques has permitted differenti-ation between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and LV hypertrophy secondary to hypertension.29 Native T1 times and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) refl ect the amount of interstitial myocardial fibrosis. The In-ternational T1 Multicenter CMR study included 95 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 69 pati-ents with essential hypertension, 23 carriers of sarco-mere gene mutations without LV hypertrophy and 23 healthy volunteers. Patients with hypertrophic cardi-omyopathy had longer native T1 times (1169 ± 41 ms vs. 1058 ± 29 ms, P < 0.001) and higher ECV (0.31 ± 0.06 vs. 0.24 ± 0.04, P < 0.001) compared with hyper-tensive patients. Interestingly, sarcomere gene mutati-on carriers had significantly longer native T1 times as compared with healthy volunteers (1105 ± 17 ms vs. 1044 ± 18 ms, P < 0.001) but similar ECV. Therefore, T1-mapping CMR techniques permit as well early de-tection of structural changes in mutation carriers who have not developed yet the phenotype. Similarly, diffe-rentiation between patients with early non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and individuals with physiolo-gical adaptation to exercise (‘athlete’s heart’) has been possible with calculation of native T1 times, ECV and T2 times.30 Patients with early presentation of dilated cardiomyopathy displayed significantly larger native T1 times, ECV and T2 times (indicating replacement fi-brosis) as compared with individuals performing aero-bic exercise more than 6 h per week (Figure 3). These techniques have also helped to better understand the LV diastolic function of patients with heart failure and preserved LVEF. In 24 patients with heart failure and preserved LVEF, Rommel et al.31 showed that ECV was an independent predictor of invasively measured LV stiffness constant (r = 0.75; P < 0.01). Furthermore, patients with an ECV below the median (32.3%) were characterized by prolonged active LV relaxation whe-reas patients with an ECV above the median showed higher LV stiffness constant suggesting differences in the pathological mechanisms of symptoms. In the fi – eld of myocarditis, the MyoRacer-Trial assessed the diagnostic accuracy of T1 and T2 mapping CMR tech-niques in 129 patients with suspected myocarditis (61 with acute and 68 with chronic symptoms).32 Biventri-cular endomyocardial biopsy was performed in 93% of patients. In the group with acute symptoms, native T1 mapping yielded the higher area under the curve to diagnose myocarditis (0.82, P = 0.002) followed by T2 mapping (0.81, P = 0.001) and ECV (0.75, P = 0.04) as compared with Lake Louise criteria (0.56). In pati-ents with chronic symptoms, T2 mapping permitted differentiation between myocarditis and no myocar-ditis patients and provided a significantly higher area under the curve (0.77) compared with native T1 ma-pping (0.53, P = 0.004) and Lake Loiuse criteria (0.53, P = 0.002). Finally, the prognostic implications of T1 mapping CMR techniques were evaluated in a pro-spective multicentre study which included 637 conse-cutive patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.33 D uring a median follow-up of 22 months, 28 patients died (22 from cardiac cause) and 68 composite heart failure events were recorded. Each 10 ms increase in native T1 time was independently associated with 10% increase in the risk of all-cause mortality and 7% incre-ase in the risk of composite heart failure events. The efficacy of new transcatheter therapies for mi-tral regurgitation such as the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) is defi ned by reduction in mitral regurgitation grade, reverse remodelling of car-diac chambers and improvement in LVEF and symp-toms. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference standard to assess cardiac chamber volumes. In 20 patients undergoing MitraClip implantation, LV and right ventricular volumes and function (including feature tracking circumferential and radial strain) were assessed at baseline and 7 days after the procedure.34 Although there was a significant improvement in heart failure symptoms and reducti-on in mitral regurgitation, there was neither signifi-cant reverse remodelling nor improvement in systolic function of the LV and right ventricle. Probably, CMR was performed too early after the procedure to ob-serve any meaningful change in ventricular volumes and function. However, the device does not affect the image quality to assess ventricular volumes.

Figure 3. Native T1 time, extracellular volume and T2 time assessed with CMR to differentiate between the early phase of dilated cardiomyopathy and an ‘athlete’s heart’. CMR data acquisition in a healthy control (panels A–E), a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (panels F–J) and an individual with ‘athlete’s heart’ (panels K–O). The healthy control had normal LVEF (58%, panel A), the septal T2 time was 51.6 ms (panel B), the septal native T1 time was 924.9 ms (panel C) and there was no LGE (panel D) or diffuse fibrosis (ECV 27%, panel E). In contrast, the patient with dilated cardiomyopathy showed mildly reduced LVEF (48%, panel F), septal T2 time 59.8 ms (panel G), septal native T1 time 1017.8 ms (panel H) and midwall fi brosis in the inferoseptum (panel I, arrow) on LGE and significant diffuse fibrosis as refl ected by an ECV of 35% (panel J, arrow). In the individual with ‘athlete’s heart’, the LVEF was relatively preserved (53%, panel K), the septal T2 time was 50.4 ms (panel L), the native T1 time was 931.4 ms (panel M) and there was no LGE (panel N) and the value of ECV was similar to that of the healthy individual (28%, panel O). Accordingly, early stages of dilated cardiomyopathy show mildly reduced function and development of replacement fibrosis, phenomena not observed in healthy individuals or patients with ‘athlete’s heart’. Reproduced with permission from Mordi et al.30 This Figure has been reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

NUCLEAR IMAGING

Various articles were dedicated to improved detecti-on of CAD. Lee et al.35 performed 13N-ammonia po-sitron emission tomography (PET) and derived quanti-tative measures such as hyperaemic myocardial blood flow, coronary flow reserve, and relative flow reserve for comparison with invasive FFR (<0.8) which is con-sidered the reference for detecting functionally signi-ficant coronary artery stenoses. This study provides optimal cut-off values for 13N-ammonia PET for the diagnosis of significant CAD, being 1.99 mL/min/g for hyperaemic myocardial blood flow, 2.12 for coronary flow reserve and 0.82 for relative flow reserve. While all quantitative PET measures performed signifi cantly better than relative perfusion defect assessment, rela-tive flow reserve showed the highest diagnostic accu-racy to predict the functional significance of a stenosis. In the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease-2 (CE-MARC 2) multicenter randomized clinical trial, Greenwood et al.36 assessed whether non-invasive imaging-guided care is superior to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelinesdirected care in re-ducing unnecessary angiography (primary endpoint), defined as no significant coronary artery stenosis ba-sed on FFR measurement >0.8 or <70% stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. A total of 1202 symptomatic patients with suspected CAD were enrolled and randomized to stress CMR, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) or NICE guidelines-di-rected care. Within 12 months of follow-up, the en-dpoint occurred in 69 (28.8%) patients in the NICE guidelines-directed care group, which was significantly reduced to 36 (7.5%) in the CMR group and to 34 (7.1%) in the MPS group (P < 0.001 for both vs. NICE, with MPS and CMR being not significantly different). The role of nuclear imaging in heart failure was hi-ghlighted by sub-analyses of two important prospecti-ve trials: the PET and Recovery Following Revascula-rization (PARR-2) study and the Adreview Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure (ADMIRE-HF).37-39 The PARR-2 study is the karlargest randomi-zed trial evaluating the prognostic benefit of 18F-flu-orodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-assisted management vs. standard care in patients with severe LV dysfunction and CAD considered for revascularization or trans-plantation; the 5-year outcome data revealed no di-fferences in the composite event rate (cardiac death, infarction, or cardiac hospitalization): 53% in the PET arm vs. 57% in the standard care arm (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62–1.07; P = 0.15).39 However, if only patients who adhered to the recommendation of the FDG PET scan were included, the outcome was significantly im-proved in PET-assisted management (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54–0.99; P = 0.042). The results suggest that evalu-ation of myocardial viability with PET can aid in the decision making of patients with ischaemic LV dysfunc-tion who are considered for revascularization. The ADMIRE-HF study demonstrated that assess-ment of myocardial sympathetic innervation with 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scintigraphy has in-cremental prognostic information in heart failure pa-tients and may identify patients with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death.40 In a sub-study of the ADMIRE-HF trial, Hachamovitch et al.38 investigated whether the use of 123I-mIBG imaging to guide implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation will result in improved patient prognosis and efficiency of care. Of 777 patients (65% ischaemic heart disease) who did not have an ICD at the time of the index 123I-mIBG scan, 75 (9.6%) died, 23 (3%) presented with sudden cardiac death and 26 (3.3%) with life-threatening arrhythmias during a median of 17 months. Planar 123I-mIBG imaging was an indepen-dent and incremental predictor of all-cause mortality. In addition, in the extension study of the ADMIRE-HF trial (ADMIRE-HFX), the prognostic significance of patterns of 123I-mIBG uptake (refl ecting myocardial denervation) and 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial per-fusion imaging was assessed in 619 ischaemic and 319 non-ischaemic heart failure patients.37 The extent and severity of myocardial denervation were quantified as percentage of total myocardium and the segment de-nervation score was calculated based on a 17-segment model using a 5-point scale. Moreover, the area of mismatch between 123I-mIBG/99mTc-tetrofosmin up-take was calculated. Mortality was higher in patients with denervation involving >50% of the myocardium. The highest cardiac mortality risk for ischaemic heart failure patients was observed with perfusion defects involving 20–40% of the myocardium. In contrast, non-ischaemic heart failure patients with smaller perfusion abnormalities (<20% of myocardium), but with a large discrepancy between 123I-mIBG and 99mTc-tetrofos-min defect sizes, were at highest risk of cardiac death, suggesting a potential prognostic role of the degree of denervation in areas with preserved myocardial perfu-sion in non-ischaemic heart failure patients.
An excessive catecholamine stimulation of the myo-cardium has been proposed as potential underlying mechanism of Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy, a rever-sible cause of heart failure. To test this hypothesis, Christensen et al.41 evaluated at admission and follow-up the sympathetic cardiac innervation with 123I-mIBG scintigraphy and plasma cathecolamine levels in 32 pa-tients diagnosed with Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy and 20 controls. At admission, Tako-tsubo cardiomyo-pathy patients showed lower cardiac 123I-mIBG uptake and higher levels of epinephrine compared with con-trols. At follow-up, cardiac 123I-mIBG uptake normali-zed whereas the plasma epinephrine levels remained elevated in the Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy patients. This hyperadrenergic activity may play a central role in the pathogenesis of this cardiomyopathy and may have important implications for clinical management.
Finally, nuclear imaging techniques have provided important diagnostic information in patients with sus-pected endocarditis. Caobelli et al.42 performed dual-isotope imaging in 34 patients with suspected endo-carditis of native (n = 12) or prosthetic (n = 22) valves employing 111In-labeled white blood cells (WBC) and 99mTc for perfusion imaging on a dedicated cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detector equipped SPECT (Figure 4). The high-energy resolution and sensitivity of novel CZT detector equipped camera enable simultaneous imaging of multiple isotopes enhancing the detection of molecular/cellular signals. Compared with standard 111In-WBC planar scintigraphy and SPECT, dual-isoto-pe CZT imaging yielded superior image quality, im-proved reader confidence, and improved diagnostic accuracy based on surgery or Duke Criteria during follow-up, thus demonstrating feasibility and added di-agnostic value.

HYBRID IMAGING

It is clear that hybrid imaging (integrating two imaging modalities, mostly PET-CMR or PET-CT) is claiming a position in cardiovascular evaluations. Sometimes it is not necessary to use hybrid imaging equipment, but simple fusion of the separate images is also feasi-ble. For example, fusion of coronary CTA and SPECT images has been performed previously, but the image fusion and presentation has been further developed by Nakahara et al.:43 with this approach it is possible to present the SPECT bull’s eye plot overlaid with the coronary arteries. In addition, Maffessanti and col-leagues developed fusion software that combines three-dimensional displays of the coronary anatomy obtained with coronary CTA with colour maps of LV longitudinal strain obtained with threedimensional echocardiography, permitting visualization of the coronary stenosis along with its functional consequences (reduced LV strain) (Figure 5).44
Specifically in the field of molecular imaging, hybrid imaging becomes increasingly used to understand pathophysiology in CAD, with specific focus on vul-nerable plaque imaging. Bala and colleagues used PET-CT and fluorine-18 labelled vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 (anti-VCAM-1 nanobody, cA-bVCAM-1–5), to demonstrate the feasibility in a mu-rine-atherosclerotic model to detect aortic plaque in-flammation.45 Increased tracer uptake was detected in aortic regions with increased atherosclerosis both on PET-CT and on histology. This is just one of the many studies ongoing to obtain further insight in differences between vulnerable and stable atherosclerotic plaqu-es. In the short-term, more animal studies are needed focusing on the coronary arteries, then translational studies to patients, and finally outcome studies. Positron emission tomography-cardiovascular mag-netic resonance imaging (PET-CMR) is another mo-dality that is increasingly used, and already some cli-nical studies in patients have been reported this year. Bulluck and coworkers used PET-CMR and FDG in 21 patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial in-farction (STEMI) 5 days after infarction, and follow-up scans were obtained 1 year later in 12 patients.46 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the infarct size (using late contrast-enhanced CMR) and the area at risk (using T2-mapping). Imme-diately after infarction, the area of reduced FDG up-take was signifi cantly larger than the infarct size on late contrast-enhanced CMR (37.2 ± 11.6% vs. 22.3 ± 11.7%; P < 0.001), but was similar to the area at risk on CMR T2-mapping (37.2 ± 11.6% vs. 36.3 ± 12.2%; P = NS). On the 1-year follow-up scans, the area of reduced FDG uptake was signifi cantly smaller as com-pared with the acute scans (19.5 [6.3–31.8%] vs. 44.0 [21.3–55.3%]; P = 0.002) and correlated closely with the area of infarction on late contrast-enhanced CMR. These findings contribute to our understanding of scar formation over time after acute myocardial infarction. Rischpler et al.47 used PET-CMR from a different perspective, namely to explore the value of FDG upta-ke in the infarct area (defined by late contrast-enhan-ced CMR) as a biosignal to predict functional recovery. In 49 patients, PET-CMR was performed within 5 days after infarction, and follow-up CMR (to assess functional recovery) was performed 6–9 months later. Comparison of PET-CMR with circulating leucocytes and monocytes was performed to measure cellular in-nate immune response. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the infarcted area exceeded late gadolinium enhance-ment extent (33.2 ± 16.2% LV myocardium vs. 20.4 ± 10.6%, P < 0.0001) and corresponded to the area at risk (r = 0.87, P < 0.0001), indicating that FDG uptake early after infarction may be a biosignal of myocar-dial injury. The peripheral blood count of CD14high/ CD16+ monocytes correlated with the infarction size and FDG uptake, supporting the hypothesis that FDG uptake refl ects injury. Moreover, the FDG uptake in the infarcted myocardium was highest in areas with transmural scar, and was related inversely with functi-onal recovery. All these findings may change our view on FDG uptake early after infarction, namely that it represents myocardial injury rather than viability.

Figure 4. Evaluation of prosthetic valve endocarditis with nuclear imaging techniques. Representative images of a patient with suspected endocarditis of aortic valve prosthesis. From left to right, planar white blood cell scans show blood pool, with uncertainty about a valvular focus, whereas conventional SPECT/CT images suggest a potential hot spot in the region of the prosthetic valve, but with limited resolution. Dual isotope cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) images show reduced noise and a focal accumulation adjacent to the prosthetic valve suggesting the presence of endocarditis (arrows). During surgical aortic valve replacement, an abscess was identified under the right coronary artery ostium, matching the hot spot on the CZT scan and confirming the diagnosis of endocarditis. HLA = horizontal long-axis; In = Indio; SA = short-axis; VLA= vertical long-axis; WBC = white blood cells. Reproduced with permission from Caobelli et al.42 This Figure has been reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 5. Fusion imaging of coronary CTA and three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography to assess the functional consequences of coronary stenosis. Combined three-dimensional displays of speckle tracking and CTA, in a patient with >70% stenosis in the mid right coronary artery (purple arrow). The infero-septal view shows reduced LV longitudinal strain in the basal segment (colour-coded in orange shades) subtended by this coronary artery. In ad-dition, note a diffuse calcified plaque in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery present causing reduced LV longitudinal strain in the mid-apical segments of the antero-septal view. Reproduced with permission from Maffessanti et al.44 This Figure has been reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

 

Conflict of interest: The Department of Cardio-logy of the Leiden University Medical Center recei-ved research grants from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Victoria Delgado received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, outside the submitted work. Oliver Gaemperli reports personal fees from Servier, non-financial support from Amgen, outside the submitted work. Massimo Lom-bardi has nothing to disclose. Jeroen Bax has nothing to disclose.

Drug and material disclaimer: The mention of trade names, commercial products organizations, and the inclusion of advertisements in the journal does not imply endorsement by the European Heart Jour-nal, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The editors and publishers have taken all re-asonable precautions to verify drug names and doses, the results of experimental work and clinical findings published in the journal. The ultimate responsibility for the use and dosage of drugs mentioned in the jo-urnal and in interpretation of published material lies with the medical practitioner, and the editors and pu-blisher cannot accept liability for damages arising from any error or omissions in the journal. Please inform the editors of any errors. The opinions expressed in the European Heart Journal are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Society of Cardiology, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated.
OUP and the ESC are not responsible or in any way liable for the accuracy of the translation, for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies, or for any consequences arising therefore. Dora Fabijanović and Saša Pavasović are solely responsible for the translation published in this reprint. Translation edited by: Mario Ivanuša. Language editing: Tomislav Salopek.

References
1. Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M, Nichols M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3232-3245. https://doi.org/10.1093/eur-heartj/ehw334
2. Papolos A, Narula J, Bavishi C, Chaudhry FA, Sengupta PP. U.S. hospital use of echocardiography: insights from the nationwide in-patient sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:502-511. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.090
3. Lancellotti P, Price S, Edvardsen T, Cosyns B, Neskovic AN, Dulghe-ru R, et al. The use of echocardiography in acute cardiovascular care: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:119-146. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu210
4. Picano E, Pellikka PA. Ultrasound of extravascular lung water: a new standard for pulmonary congestion. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2097-2104. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw164
5. Platz E, Lewis EF, Uno H, Peck J, Pivetta E, Merz AA, et al. Detection and prognostic value of pulmonary congestion by lung ultrasound in ambulatory heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1244-1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv745
6. Aras MA, Teerlink JR. Lung ultrasound: a ‘B-line’ to the prediction of decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1252-1254. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw094
7. Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A, Haugaa KH, Urheim S. Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making? Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1196-1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv529
8. Kuznetsova T, Cauwenberghs N, Knez J, Yang WY, Herbots L, D’hooge J, et al. Additive prognostic value of left ventricular sys-tolic dysfunction in a population-based cohort. Circ Cardiovasc Im-aging. 2016;9:e004661. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116. 004661
9. Sengel øv M, Jørgensen PG, Jensen JS, Bruun NE, Olsen FJ, Fritz-Han-sen T, et al. Global longitudinal strain is a superior predictor of all-cause mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1351-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcmg.2015.07.013
10. Kamperidis V, Marsan NA, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Left ventricular systolic function assessment in secondary mitral regurgitation: left ventricu-lar ejection fraction vs. speckle tracking global longitudinal strain. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:811-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv680
11. Ben Zekry S, Freeman J, Jajoo A, He J, Little SH, Lawrie GM, et al. Patient-specific quantitation of mitral valve strain by computer analysis of threedimensional echocardiography: a Pilot Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging2016;9:e003254. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCI-MAGING.115.003254
12. Thaden JJ, Nkomo VT, Suri RM, Maleszewski JJ, Soderberg DJ, Clavel MA, et al. Sex-related differences in calcific aortic stenosis: correlat-ing clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and computed to-mography aortic valve calcium score to excised aortic valve weight. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:693-699. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv560
13. Yeboah J, Young R, McClelland RL, Delaney JC, Polonsky TS, Da-wood FZ, et al. Utility of nontraditional risk markers in atheroscle-rotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 January19;67:139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.058
14. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/ AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce ath-erosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a
15. Nasir K, Bittencourt MS, Blaha MJ, Blankstein R, Agatson AS, Rivera JJ, et al. Implications of coronary artery calcium testing among statin candidates according to American College Of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol management guidelines: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1657-1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.066
16. Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, Baloch KN, Daniels MR, Hoffmann U, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes with anatomic versus functional diagnostic testing strategies in symptomatic patients with suspect-ed coronary artery disease: results from the PROMISE randomized trial. Circulation. 2016;133:1995-2007. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020259
17. Lubbers M, Dedic A, Coenen A, Galema T, Akkerhuis J, Bruning T, et al. Calcium imaging and selective computed tomography an-giography in comparison to functional testing for suspected coro-nary artery disease: the multicentre, randomized CRESCENT trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1232-1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ ehv700
18. Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, Lammers J, Lamfers EJ, Rensing BJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography for suspected ACS in the era of high-sensitivity troponins: randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.045
19. Gaur S, Øvrehus KA, Dey D, Leipsic J, Bøtker HE, Jensen JM, et al. Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coro-nary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1220-1227. https://doi.org/10.1093/eur-heartj/ehv690
20. Douglas PS, De BB, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRct-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:435-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.057
21. Pache G, Schoechlin S, Blanke P, Dorfs S, Jander N, Arepalli CD, et al. Early hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic heart valves. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2263-2271. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv526
22. Gündüz S, Ozkan M, Kalcik M, Gursoy OM, Astarcioglu MA, Kara-koyun S, et al. Sixty-four-section cardiac computed tomography in mechanical prosthetic heart valve dysfunction: thrombus or pannus. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e003246. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCIMAGING.115.003246
23. Suh YJ, Hong GR, Han K, Im DJ, Chang S, Hong YJ, et al. Assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical findings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004153. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCIMAGING.115.004153
24. Girdauskas E, Rouman M, Disha K, Fey B, Dubslaff G, Theis B, et al. Functional aortic root parameters and expression of aortopathy in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1786-1796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.015
25. Garcia J, Barker AJ, Murphy I, Jarvis K, Schnell S, Collins JD, et al. Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging-based character-ization of aortic morphometry and haemodynamics: impact of age, aortic diameter, and valve morphology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag-ing. 2016;17:877-884. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev228
26. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Karunaharamoorthy A, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ, Blaszczyk E, Markl M, et al. Evaluation of aortic blood flow and wall shear stress in aortic stenosis and its association with left ventricular remodeling. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004038. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004038
27. Turkbey EB, Nacif MS, Guo M, McClelland RL, Teixeira PB, Bild DE, et al. Prevalence and correlates of myocardial scar in a US cohort. JAMA. 2015;314:1945-1954. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015. 14849
28. Chin CW, Messika-Zeitoun D, Shah AS, Lefevre G, Bailleul S, Yeung EN, et al. A clinical risk score of myocardial fibrosis predicts adverse outcomes in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:713-723. https:// doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv525
29. Hinojar R, Varma N, Child N, Goodman B, Jabbour A, Yu CY, et al. T1 Mapping in Discrimination of Hypertrophic Phenotypes: Hy-pertensive Heart Disease and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Find-ings From the International T1 Multicenter Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e003285. https:// doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003285
30. Mordi I, Carrick D, Bezerra H, Tzemos NT. T1 and T2 mapping for early diagnosis of dilated non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy in middle-aged patients and differentiation from normal physiological adapta-tion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:797-803. https://doi. org/10.1093/ehjci/jev216
31. Rommel KP, von Roeder M, Latuscynski K, Oberueck C, Blazek S, Fengler K, et al. Extracellular volume fraction for characteriza-tion of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1815-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2016.02.018
32. Lurz P, Luecke C, Eitel I, Fohrenbach F, Frank C, Grothoff M, et al. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis: the MyoRacer-Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1800-1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.013
33. Puntmann VO, Carr-White G, Jabbour A, Yu CY, Gebker R, Kelle S, et al. T1-Mapping and outcome in nonischemic cardiomyopa-thy: all-cause mortality and heart failure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.001
34. Lurz P, Serpytis R, Blazek S, Seeburger J, Mangner N, Noack T, et al. Assessment of acute changes in ventricular volumes, function, and strain after interventional edge-to-edge repair of mitral regurgitation using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1399-1404. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev115
35. Lee JM, Kim CH, Koo BK, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, et al. Integrated myocardial perfusion imaging diagnostics improve detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis by 13N-ammonia posi-tron emission tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004768. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004768
36. Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, McCann GP, Plein S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al; CE-MARC 2 Investigators. Effect of care guided by car-diovascular magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or NICE guidelines on subsequent unnecessary angiography rates: The CE-MARC 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:1051-1060. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12680
37. Clements IP, Kelkar AA, Garcia EV, Butler J, Chen J, Folks R, et al. Prognostic significance of (123)I-mIBG SPECT myocardial imaging in heart failure: differences between patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:384-
390. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev295
38. Hachamovitch R, Nutter B, Menon V, Cerqueira MD. Predicting risk versus predicting potential survival benefi t using 123I-mIBG imaging in patients with systolic dysfunction eligible for implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation: analysis of data from the prospective AD-MIRE-HF study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e003110. https:// doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.003110
39. Mc Ardle B, Shukla T, Nichol G, deKemp RA, Bernick J, Guo A, et al; PARR-2 Investigators. Long-term follow-up of outcomes with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imagin-gassisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dys-function secondary to coronary disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imag-ing. 2016;9:e004331. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115. 004331
40. Jacobson AF, Senior R, Cerqueira MD, Wong ND, Thomas GS, Lo-pez VA, et al; ADMIRE-HF Investigators. Myocardial iodine-123 me-ta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure. Results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Im-aging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2212-2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.014
41. Christensen TE, Bang LE, Holmvang L, Skovgaard DC, Oturai DB, Soholm H, et al. (123)IMIBG scintigraphy in the subacute state of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:982-
990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.028
42. Caobelli F, Wollenweber T, Bavendiek U, Kuhn C, Schutze C, Ge-worski L, et al. Simultaneous dual-isotope solid-state detector SPECT for improved tracking of white blood cells in suspected en-docarditis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:436-443. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehw231
43. Nakahara T, Iwabuchi Y, Murakami K. Diagnostic performance of 3D bull’s eye display of SPECT and coronary CTA fusion. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:703-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcmg.2015.09.024
44. Maffessanti F, Patel AR, Patel MB, Walter JJ, Mediratta A, Med-vedofsky D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of the haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis using fusion of cardiac computed tomography and 3D echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag-ing. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):670-680. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew147
45. Bala G, Blykers A, Xavier C, Descamps B, Broisat A, Ghezzi C, et al. Targeting of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 by 18F-labelled nanobodies for PET/CT imaging of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:1001-1008. https://doi. org/10.1093/ehjci/jev346
46. Bulluck H, White SK, Frohlich GM, Casson SG, O’meara C, New-ton A, et al. Quantifying the area at risk in reperfused ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients using hybrid cardiac posi-tron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Car-diovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e003900. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIM-AGING.115.003900
47. Rischpler C, Dirschinger RJ, Nekolla SG, Kossmann H, Nicolosi S, Hanus F, et al. Prospective evaluation of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in postischemic myocardium by simultaneous positron emis-sion tomography/magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic mark-er of functional outcome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004316. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004316.

Search in archive

Submit article






Subscriptions

If you wish to receive the Romanian Journal of Cardiology, even if you are not a member of the Romanian Society of Cardiology, please fill in the form below, the annual cost (4 issues) being 195RON.

Payment can be made in the account of the Romanian Society of Cardiology:
RO28BTRL04101205M6647601, opened at Banca Transilvania, the Division for Medical Doctors from Cotroceni.

After having made the payment, please offer proof , by sending a copy from the bill or order of payment via e-mail: office@cardioportal.ro